Building Innovation Systems to facilitate Transformations in Modern Energy Cooking Services (MECS)

project details

Building Innovation Systems to facilitate Transformations in Modern Energy Cooking Services (MECS)

Research Area

Energy

Project Status

Completed

Start Date

Jan, 2021

Introduction

This research aimed at capturing historical and ongoing efforts to stimulate the adoption and diffusion of electric cooking, among them, research and development (R&D), quality assurance, market development, financing, education, advocacy and policy support. This research project focused on delivering two key things: 1) empirically grounded maps of existing innovation systems of relevance to MECS in 3 countries, their constituent strengths and weaknesses, and the potential pathways to transforming them; and 2) an empirically grounded, practical framework through which such impact can be achieved. The aim was to provide, by the end of three years, a concrete basis upon which the broader MECS programme can action transformations in modern energy cooking services.

Electric Pressure Cooker

Project Streams

The work was divided into two streams:

The work focused on Kenya, Tanzania and Rwanda, three countries that has been identified by the broader MECS programme where there is some nascent potential.

The research deployed the Socio-Technical Innovation Systems conceptual approach developed from in-depth historical analysis on the solar home systems markets in Kenya and Tanzania.

Methodologies

The research takes forward the conceptual approach described as socio-technical innovation systems building, which was developed on the basis of in-depth historical analysis at Sussex on the solar home systems markets in Kenya and Tanzania, and on broader work on low carbon energy technologies in India and China, as well as insights from various literatures including innovation studies and socio-technical transitions theory.

We operationalised the Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) method to map the existing innovation systems and identify existing pathways through which the MECS programme and the stakeholders it convenes might impact on these. This was followed by in-depth, semi-structured interviews to develop a more detailed picture of the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities around MECS in each country.

The research team sought to intersect directly with existing and future research (at Loughborough) convened under the MECS programme on social practices around cooking in order to ensure the outputs of this stream are aligned with, or realistically seek to influence, existing cooking practices.